When it’s time to retire a brand

With news of Holden's brand demise, CMO asked the big brand question: Just how do you know when it’s time to retire a brand?


When news of General Motors’ decision to ‘retire’ the iconic Australian Holden brand broke in early February, public outcry and a wave of nostalgia washed through the digital and print channels.

Media commentators and consumers alike promptly rummaged into the very many reasons for the brand’s demise, shared memories of riding in the Holden vehicles of their childhood, waxed lyrical about the first Holden car they owned, and generally mourned the loss of a brand that once symbolised the Australian dream and the nation’s unique landscape.

But as has been made clear, none of the emotion connected with Holden was enough to save the brand from the axe, a fact attributed to rapidly declining sales, the demise of the sedan in favour of the SUV, and the high cost of production for one of the world’s few right-hand drive markets. 

With news of such a significant brand ‘retirement’, and the outpouring it generated, the team at CMO wanted to ask a bigger question: Just how do you know when it’s time to retire a brand? What are the warning signs? Have the reasons changed in a digitally and socially connected world? Which companies have done brand retirement well, versus those that did it badly?

And importantly: Would anyone have wanted to keep the Holden brand alive?

The business dilemma

The universal view from the many brand strategists CMO spoke is brand retirement or exits are very much a commercial, business decision. While viewing ‘retirement’ as a rare phenomenon, Zuni managing director, Mike Zeederberg, noted brand exits usually directly correlate with a business problem or issue.

Almost exactly the same issues are at play when businesses rename, or change the name of a brand or product, and largely the same considerations,” he said. “How much equity exists in the existing brand? What value does it hold to consumers, and on the balance sheet, and what role does this branding play, if any, in the customer journey and purchase decisions?”

Zeederberg pointed to Kentucky Fried Chicken changing to KFC in 1991 in order to drop the word ‘fried’.

“With the advent of keto, the de-demonising of fat and the push towards trusted brands and nostalgia, the group changed back to the full name last year, now using both as part of its brand,” he said.  

Equally, Landor Americas president, Gabriel Miller, positioned retiring or exiting a brand as a commercially driven business decision. “A brand is designed to reflect the company’s business strategy. If it’s not serving that strategy, and continuing to build value for the company, it’s time to start to think about next options, such as retiring or exiting from a portfolio,” he said.

A US case in point was when United Airlines acquired Continental Airlines. “United’s strategy was simply to add more routes to its offering, so it could start to retire Continental and maintain the same strategy, allowing United be the hero,” Miller said. “It’s about how the brand is helping the business grow.” 

The Contenders, a boutique branding agency, refers to it as brands being fit for purpose.

“We have an internal mantra at The Contenders that brands must serve a purpose to be fit for purpose. Both fit and relevance can be measured and should to inform your approach to whether you retire a brand or not,” The Contenders CEO, Joe Rogers, said.

“The only question to ask is: Does the brand hinder or enhance your ability to deliver ROI? That should be your primary guide. From here, there are many different paths to explore from selling the brand to doubling down on it.”

Measuring brand value

Key to forming these decisions is a brand’s worth in the market. For Rogers, measuring a brand’s value comes back to brand salience and brand image.

“Does the brand still stand for something desired by consumers and unique to you and is the image of the brand something that in culture is big enough to sustain a business?” he asked. “Sales is the ultimate measure of a brand but ongoing brand tracking on attributes will predict your demise.”  

BrandHook, CEO, Pip Stocks, highlighted the millions of customer insights clients have to go on the search for to keep up to speed with consumers and trends. 

“We are always ‘banging on’ about customer intimacy and the need for brand leaders to get out with the customers. They need to find these insights by talking to customers, experiencing the brand as they do and essentially getting involved in their lives,” she said. “It’s about gathering their own ‘thick data’ to keep abreast of mind shifts and behavioural changes.”

Of course, emotion plays a big part in brands – not only in terms of positioning and impact, but also their cultural longevity. But it’s not necessarily the North Star you want dictating a brand’s future, industry pundits agreed.

“It comes back to what is the business decision, knowing you may impact some loyal fans. If that small constituency doesn’t create enough value for the brand, then it’s time for that brand to make some tough decisions,” Miller said. “Brands are like children – they aren’t cheap, they grow up, go to school, you have to buy them clothes and it’s expensive to evolve a brand. It also becomes more expensive to hold onto it for a long period of time. There may be a strong finan­cial decision to retire a brand.”

A good example of a brand that’s done retirement well is Google, Miller said. He noted the company’s approach as it looks to create the total home experience, acquiring companies such as Nest, then subsuming the brand.

“As Google has acquired brands, it’s doing a good job of making them fall under the Google umbrella and ensuring that shift from saying a Nest home, to a Google home,” he commented.

Brands that went wrong

But there are plenty of brands that went wrong. Zeederberg pointed to iSnack2.0 as a famous example of product branding gone awry, and Vegemite being forced back to the drawing board by consumers. Another example is Blockbuster, which failed to adapt to the world of streaming content and was superseded by Netflix.

“It’s brand and categories that do a good job of seeing the future and embracing change, that embrace business shifts and shift to make themselves relevant to modern times,” Miller said. “Brands have to adapt – look at taxis with Uber, or hospitality with Airbnb – they’re having to adapt to changing times.

“Blockbuster wasn’t agile enough when the world was moving to stream to adapt, and didn’t do a good job there.”

Most brands get retired because they no longer have value, or they've gone out of business, Zeederberg said. Just look at Kodak or Vine.

“Culture shifts and technology improvements definitely change the way customers think and behave,” Stocks added. “The key for any brand is to continue to evolve, keeping up to date and staying relevant. Essentially, it’s about continuing to meet customer needs. If brand leaders fail to keep on top of this and improve their customers experience constantly, their brand will die a slow [or sometimes] fast death.”

In a digital world, what’s also become apparent is consumers are looking for holistic experiences, conversations and interactions versus transactions, Miller said.

“If you are a brand still thinking about a static one-to-one relationship, and not capturing the full immersive experience with your brand assets, you are probably mediocre at best anyway. Digital is a huge part of that brand experience and how you engage with a consumer, which is paramount,” he said.

The dos and don’ts

While there’s no one-size-fits-all approach to what to do when it’s time to exit a brand, brand strategists cited several dos and don’ts.

“Pre-retirement is about communicating your intentions, retirement is about honouring your commitments, and the post-brand axe is about protecting the legacy of a brand,” Rogers explained.   

For example, during pre-retirement, be clear on possibilities but do not be unequivocal in your decision, he advised.  

“During retirement, do ensure the organisation is equipped to meet its obligations to consumers from warranty to product return but do not communicate emotionally. Be factual and informative,” he continued. “Post-retirement, do seek to find ways to enhance the legacy of the brand through establishing its place in history but do not expect to be thanked.”    

Miller referenced emotional connection as a key element in tackling brand retirement successfully.

“If you have a huge social media following or your website is a big database of loyal users with major influences, you want to proactively think of how you answer these questions from the loyal following before you make big decisions,” he advised. “Externally, you need to look at how it affects the market, and pre-emptively have a plan to articulate why you made that decision.”

Internal sentiment and culture is another important facet here, and Miller raised the question of how a brand exit will affect people and livelihoods behind that brand. “How does it impact their day-to-day work?” he asked.

It’s for this reason the decision and process of shuttering a brand shouldn’t be just the marketing team’s remit, it must involve all stakeholders from the beginning, through the journey and at the end.

“I also use the Goldilocks theory – you don’t want to be too fast with a decision, or take too long, as it can create confusion in the marketplace. Have a game plan,” Miller said. “It’s like a divorce or death in the family, you need a pragmatic approach to exiting the brand and to stick to the plan from day one. And you definitely have to be more nimble in our current digital environment.”

Rogers quoted the old saying: People forget what you said but always remember how you made them feel.  

“The people who work for the brand you are closing down have lost a job and colleagues. Lead with empathy and support them to transition to the next chapter of their lives. The way an organisation does this with its employees with trickle down to consumers and impact how they feel about the brand being retired and also the brands left,” he said.    

Communication and transition are two key words here. “Keep your customers up to date about what you are doing and why; then help transition them to something else,” Stocks said.

“Remember you are going to have lovers of the brand and some people who might rely on the brand so taking them with you in brand retirement will be key.”

An added element in the mix today is social media, one of the more recent innovations driving the need for transparent, swift and responsive action.  

“So you have to be as direct as possible, and respond in a way that’s much faster. Think about hashtags, adding and providing people in one direction. Understand social media is quicker than you think,” Miller said.

It’s also vital you engage with social media. “Transparency is an often used word, but you have to be transparent about the reasons with end users and your culture,” Miller said.

For Rogers, social media is either a communication or connection tool. The strategic decision is deciding which is which.  

“If you take the communication tool approach, it can have advantages in communicating to the community affected by the brand retirement,” he said. “If you are seeking to build connection, the trick is to give a face to the media channel through an organisational leader such as the CEO.”

Up next: Could brands actually stage a comeback? Plus more on lessons from Holden's demise

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments

Why these voice assistants are so popular nowadays? Maybe I should get one too? I am really curious.

Jill Kim

Aussie brands jump on voice-interaction bandwagon following Amazon Alexa's local launch

Read more

Your page is very helpful. Thank you for sharing with us

Eriona Ajvazi

10 brands making a positive difference to a world in crisis

Read more

Extremely insightful and well written. Thanks for the great article!

Nicole Brodie Nahum

Why COVID-19 makes it more important than ever to move at the speed of the consumer

Read more

Blockchain is one of the fastest growing technology in today's digital era. Industries like banking and finance are already using blockch...

Aniket Singh

Can blockchain deliver on its big advertising promises?

Read more

Great article Emma. So many gems in there. Awesome to have you in the team!

One Small Step Collective

Why COVID-19 makes it more important than ever to move at the speed of the consumer

Read more

Blog Posts

How can organisations debias their decisions?

​People whose personal details and experiences signal they come from racially diverse backgrounds are less likely than anglo or Caucasian candidates to make it through the first cut in recruitment processes. Even if the organisation says it values diversity.

Dr Karen Morley

Author, commentator

Is your marketing team adapting quickly enough to the COVID-19 crisis?

The impact of coronavirus is far reaching with the true impact on the economy and businesses is unknown. While there are a few categories and brands experiencing growth, for the most part the crisis is wreaking havoc for large and small operators across many sectors including entertainment, tourism, retail, fitness, services and the list goes on.

Teresa Sperti

Founder, Arktic Fox

Why COVID-19 makes it more important than ever to move at the speed of the consumer

There is no doubt the challenges we are facing as businesses, advertisers and audiences with COVID-19 are all unprecedented. But with this comes an opportunity to take stock and re-evaluate current strategies, plans and processes to drive efficiencies and relevance in today's market.

Emma Macey

General manager, SuperNova Media

Sign in