Think TV report claims TV ads still trump YouTube and Facebook

The marketing and tech company recently commissioned marketing science academic Professor Karen Nelson-Field to substantiate the findings


Consumers still buy after looking at TV ads more than their YouTube and Facebook counterparts, a report commissioned by Think TV and using artificial intelligence claims.

The TV advocacy group recently asked marketing science academic, Professor Karen Nelson-Field, to undertake a new study using eye-tracking software to find out the true ‘attention impact’ of video ads consumed across the different media platforms.

In the research, 2583 Australians were exposed to 18,219 advertisements under natural viewing conditions in the home. Respondents were then tasked to go shopping in an online shopping mall, where they were able to consider up to 38,745 different brands including the ones they were exposed to in the study’s advertising.

According to the research, TV ads came out 24.1 per cent stronger than YouTube and 22 per cent stronger than Facebook. The study also celebrated TV’s greater ‘screen coverage’ - the percentage of a screen occupied by an ad - with TV coming out on top at 100 per cent.

The report then took this to mean TV provided 10 times more 'coverage' on average than Facebook and three times more coverage than Youtube, which due to their social nature naturally contain other content elements when consumers scroll down.

Interestingly, when it comes to maximising consumer engagement, the research showed that the size, frequency and speed of introduction of a brand or product within a commercial correlated to attention and sales impact. Ads that produced greater sales impact showed the brand at twice the size of poorly-performing ads showed the brand almost twice as often and were more likely to display the brand within the first two seconds.

Professor Nelson-Field said the report was aimed at getting under the hood of all the major video advertising platforms and helps advertisers make informed inventory choices when selecting media.

“Using in-home, natural viewing conditions, the report provides a clear understanding of why certain platforms drive higher levels of attention and greater levels of advertising impact than others,” she said.

Think TV Australia was formed in May 2016 with founding members Nine Network, Seven Network, Network Ten and Multi Channel Network/Foxtel. The report was released just a day after CBS announced its intention to buy out financially troubled Channel Ten.

Speaking at a media briefing at Think TV's offices in Sydney, the company's director of research and insights, Steve Weaver, insisted the report wasn’t about pushing TV as the best advertising option onto everyone and was about simply sharing unbiased data.

“We deliberately wanted to genuinely give you the data and say, here is the data, you make the assessment,” Weaver said. “People are always going to buy TV and online and print, all we can do is continue putting the data out there, so we can all make informed decisions."

The report did not break down the impact of video ads across the various media channels according to age demographics, so any sign of whether millennials and the next generation of viewers were less impacted by TV than their older generational counterparts was unclear.

The second tranche of Nelson-Field’s findings will be released at the ReThinkTV conference on 14 September.

Follow CMO on Twitter: @CMOAustralia, take part in the CMO conversation on LinkedIn: CMO ANZ, join us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CMOAustralia, or check us out on Google+:google.com/+CmoAu    

 


Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments

Blog Posts

Building a human-curated brand

If the FANG (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google) sector and their measured worth are the final argument for the successful 21st Century model, then they are beyond reproach. Fine-tuning masses of algorithms to reduce human touchpoints and deliver wild returns to investors—all with workforces infinitesimally small compared to the giants of the 20th Century—has been proven out.

Will Smith

Co-founder and head of new markets, The Plum Guide

Sustainability trends brands can expect in 2020

​Marketers have made strides this year in sustainability with the number of brands rallying behind the Not Business As Usual alliance for action against climate change being a sign of the times. While sustainability efforts have gained momentum this year, 2020 is shaping up to be the year brands are really held accountable for their work in this area.

Ben King

CSR manager & sustainability expert, Finder

The trouble with Scotty from Marketing

As a Marketer, the ‘Scotty from Marketing’ meme troubles me.

Natalie Robinson

Director of marketing and communications, Melbourne Polytechnic

If you think it can benefit both consumer and seller then it would be great

Simon Bird

Why Ford is counting on the Internet of Things to drive customer engagement

Read more

It's a good idea. Customers really should control their data. Now I understand why it's important.

Elvin Huntsberry

Salesforce CMO: Modern marketers have an obligation to give customers control of their data

Read more

Instagram changes algorithms every time you get used to them. It really pisses me off. What else pisses me off? The fact that Instagram d...

Nickwood

Instagram loses the like in Australia; industry reacts positively

Read more

I tried www.analisa.io to see my Instagram Insight

Dina Rahmawati

7 marketing technology predictions for 2016

Read more

The saying is pretty tongue in cheek. It's not saying that marketers are bad people, nor that they don't take themselves seriously. There...

LYF Solutions

The trouble with Scotty from Marketing - The CMO view - CMO Australia

Read more

Latest Podcast

More podcasts

Sign in