AI ethics: Designing for trust

Katja Forbes

Katja Forbes founded syfte, a specialist business in research and experience design in 2014, and is an Australian pioneer in the field of experience design. Katja is an International Director on the Interaction Design Association Board. She is proud to be a co-founding member and Local Leader in Sydney of the global community organisation, Interaction Design Association. Together with Joe Ortenzi, Katja has built a community of over 1700 designers in Sydney, providing them with learning opportunities via lecture based meetups that draw a crowd of 150 people each time, a mentoring program and workshops.

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes much more prevalent and increasingly a way of life, more questions are being asked than answered about the ethical implications of its adoption.

For example, do humans have any moral obligations towards their machine? Do ‘robots’ or AI machines have any obligations of their own? And importantly, how do we build something consumers trust even though they can’t see it?

When designing for AI, therefore, a number of questions must be put forward to ensure your organisation and the designers behind the solution are creating a product of the best ethical standards in that situation.

For starters, customers want to be able to trust you have created something that fits as closely to their ethical values as possible. These may differ from that of the designer, so it’s important to communicate these before you begin, as well as during the design itself. Just as we trust a mechanic to fix our car’s engine, or a doctor to fix what is wrong with our organs, when it comes to AI, we need to trust the designer has designed something that is indeed ethical.

That’s because a great many things critical in our lives today are happening invisibly. Brands are becoming more and more opaque in the way they’re using data, in what they’re doing with data, in how they’re making these decisions and in how they’re delivering back to customers.

To place our trust in brands as consumers, therefore, we need to be convinced that when the technology was created, it was created by someone who asked the right questions.

At an organisational level, doing your research before contracting a company to build your AI tool is one way of finding the right designer. Microsoft, for example, is keen to share its own values so clients can make an informed decision to work with the company. Values such as transparency, reliability and inclusiveness are what Microsoft’s customers place an emphasis on. It’s by constantly exhibiting these values that Microsoft ensures its retains their trust.

We also do not want our bias to be reflected in the design itself. The problem with bias, however, is we often don’t know our opinions exhibit it.

One example often used to describe how difficult the dilemma can be is what happens if an AI car lost control and were to hit a baby if it swerved left, or an elderly person if it swerved right. A designer may program the car to always swerve towards the elderly person in such a situation. But this is a subjective, rather than objective, question. The client may feel the opposite is true.

It’s also the case AI is learning from human behaviour and stereotypes. An example is Microsoft’s Tay, a chatbot on Twitter that within 24 hours became riddled with sexist, racist, Nazi biases. Another failed AI experiment was Amazon’s AI for resume screening. Having been fed 10 years’ worth of data about the types of candidates the company liked – often men – the AI started screening out CVs with any reference to ‘women’ in it. Unable to fix it, Amazon pulled the bot.

So how is this resolved? Here are a few questions to help create useful and objective AI experiences*:

  • What data content needs to be collected and why?
  • How will any data be used?
  • Who owns the data once collected?
  • What impact do we want with the AI tool?
  • What KPIs do we need to measure this?
  • How will someone’s rights be affected?
  • How will this new AI affect working conditions?
  • How will this new AI affect human rights?
  • Have we taken all perspectives into account?
  • How does this AI create a magical experience for customers and employees?
  • Do we rely on any third-party services?
  • How are stakeholders’ interests dealt with?

By giving careful thought to these answers, you will have the best opportunity to create an AI tool or experience that takes the values of all stakeholders into account.

*Reference: Augmented Service Platform Canvas –Pontus Wärnestål, Associate Professor, Halmstad University

- This article originally appeared in CMO's print magazine, Issue 1, 2019.

Tags: design thinking, customer experience management, artificial intelligence

Show Comments

Featured Whitepapers

State of the CMO 2019

CMO’s State of the CMO is an annual industry research initiative aimed at understanding how ...

More whitepapers

Blog Posts

Building a human-curated brand

If the FANG (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google) sector and their measured worth are the final argument for the successful 21st Century model, then they are beyond reproach. Fine-tuning masses of algorithms to reduce human touchpoints and deliver wild returns to investors—all with workforces infinitesimally small compared to the giants of the 20th Century—has been proven out.

Will Smith

Co-founder and head of new markets, The Plum Guide

Sustainability trends brands can expect in 2020

​Marketers have made strides this year in sustainability with the number of brands rallying behind the Not Business As Usual alliance for action against climate change being a sign of the times. While sustainability efforts have gained momentum this year, 2020 is shaping up to be the year brands are really held accountable for their work in this area.

Ben King

CSR manager & sustainability expert, Finder

The trouble with Scotty from Marketing

As a Marketer, the ‘Scotty from Marketing’ meme troubles me.

Natalie Robinson

Director of marketing and communications, Melbourne Polytechnic

If you think it can benefit both consumer and seller then it would be great

Simon Bird

Why Ford is counting on the Internet of Things to drive customer engagement

Read more

It's a good idea. Customers really should control their data. Now I understand why it's important.

Elvin Huntsberry

Salesforce CMO: Modern marketers have an obligation to give customers control of their data

Read more

Instagram changes algorithms every time you get used to them. It really pisses me off. What else pisses me off? The fact that Instagram d...

Nickwood

Instagram loses the like in Australia; industry reacts positively

Read more

I tried www.analisa.io to see my Instagram Insight

Dina Rahmawati

7 marketing technology predictions for 2016

Read more

The saying is pretty tongue in cheek. It's not saying that marketers are bad people, nor that they don't take themselves seriously. There...

LYF Solutions

The trouble with Scotty from Marketing - The CMO view - CMO Australia

Read more

Latest Podcast

More podcasts

Sign in