Will our manners go the same way as texting when robotic servants take over?

Katja Forbes

Katja Forbes founded syfte, a specialist business in research and experience design in 2014, and is an Australian pioneer in the field of experience design. Katja is an International Director on the Interaction Design Association Board. She is proud to be a co-founding member and Local Leader in Sydney of the global community organisation, Interaction Design Association. Together with Joe Ortenzi, Katja has built a community of over 1700 designers in Sydney, providing them with learning opportunities via lecture based meetups that draw a crowd of 150 people each time, a mentoring program and workshops.

Much of the talk in the industry is focused on the limited amount of time that screens have left in our lives.  

This concept is very difficult to grasp right now, with everyone from all walks of life literally glued to screens including their phone, tablet, laptop and television. However, designers everywhere now are creating for speech and not screens. Generations that follow are going to find our obsession with screens very alien.  

So what does the future look like for business owners? Firstly, customer interactions will need to be speech and not screen focussed. That means websites and social media will need a strong speech component, especially for the main sections visitors need to utilise, and to engage them in the first place.  

A few examples: While customers may press a button for frequently asked questions, the results will be spoken, rather than written. In addition, on the home page, chat bots offering service will do so verbally, and not in writing. And of course, your response would be verbal as well. Instructions for customers will all be vocal.  

So how will it look? Information we need to access, such as movie times and restaurant addresses, will be available to us in dialogue format, rather than text. We will be able to ask our voice assistant to locate it for us as well.      

A number of personal assistants have already been introduced to help us communicate in this manner. Siri from iPhone is basically a personal assistant that can do tasks like scheduling events, identifying music, make calls, setting reminders, and even booking reservations at your favourite restaurants. There are others on the market too – Google Now and Windows 10 Cortana are also some healthy competition in the mix and are meant to do more or less the same thing.   

These robotic personal assistants have unfortunately raised some ethical issues too. Since our business and personal landscape is heading this way it is important that these problems are smoothed out before they clearly become catastrophes.  

The first issue with these assistants is genuine enough and comes in the form of voice recognition problems. Sometimes these personal assistants mis-hear what you are trying to say, suggesting that intonation and perception may not be something computers can decipher.     

Their pre-emptive nature is being worked on too, and if they can master that, then these personal assistants may start to really carve a place for themselves in our lives.  

A more sinister concern for our lives being taken over by voice assistants is also coming to light. All of these personal assistants are all currently defaulted to a female voice because they are largely better-accepted by customers this way. However, this leads us to wonder how will we treat these assistants and will this rub off onto the way we treat other human beings?  

As users direct orders at these personal assistants, they will fail to soften their language with “please” and “thank you” (given these directives are not required when talking to a robot). Does this mean that we eventually start to talk to one another the same way? Will we bark orders at women, because our personal assistant robots are female sounding and that’s how we talk to them? Will this become the new normal?    

In my opinion, the simple phrases ‘please’ and ‘thank you’ empower the other person. They refer to a choice the other person is making, rather than simply being instructed to do something, where their freedom to decline is removed. They also imply appreciation for the other person.   

However, our voice assistants have no choice in whether or not  they act on your command. They are completely subservient. They have no freedom to decline. The problem comes in because they sound human and act like a human.  

Will our behaviour toward these assistants spread to the rest of our everyday life? We’re already seeing this trend in research that correlates children and their interactions with Alexa with increased rudeness to their peers.  

As speech, rather than screens, become more mainstream in our lives, it is more important than ever that children and young people are taught the difference between humans and virtual intelligence. If your life includes a servant that follows your orders, it’s important that this device is thought of exactly as that – an inanimate device.  

Humans are different in that we have emotions and have the freedom to decline. There should be no chance of people confusing these personal assistants with real human beings.  This all comes down to education, and it is going to be a very important area of our educational curriculum in future years.

 

.

Tags: voice-activated devices, emergign technology

Show Comments

Featured Whitepapers

State of the CMO 2019

CMO’s State of the CMO is an annual industry research initiative aimed at understanding how ...

More whitepapers

Blog Posts

How service heterogeneity is impacting engagement

Marketers have long known the importance of standardising products to assure quality and consistency. For services, however, standardisation is much more complex.

Dr Chris Baumann

Associate professor, Macquarie University

Kindness matters in business: why the nice guys finish first

A recent 1000-page Royal Commission report on misconduct in Australia’s financial sector revealed hair-raising stories of excessive commissions, rampant mis-selling and charges levied on the dead. So how do you stop a bank from misleading its customers?

Nick Liddell

Director of Consulting, The Clearing

Myer vs. David Jones: Do cyborgs win?

As two of Australia’s stalwart brands in Myer and David Jones continue their respective journeys through troubled waters, it heralds yet another sign of the shifting business environment and shift towards an experience economy.

Tom Uhlhorn

Founder and strategy director, Tiny CX

nice article

meripadhai

5 things marketers need to do to get better in buy in when presenting

Read more

International business is closely related to marketing or marketing activities carried out by the company. According to Gitman and McDani...

Eko Prasetyo Utomo X

Salesforce: The age of the marketing campaign is over

Read more

Back in 1968 Holden began an appeal to customers who have an interest in competition. It did this with the introduction of the HK GTS 32...

Ben Tate

Marketing professor: For Holden, brand nostalgia ain’t what it used to be

Read more

Your blog post is really good and informative. Thanks for taking time to provide us this useful information with us.Auto wrapping uaeADF ...

Yes Machinery

Image intelligence:10 must-see infographics for marketers

Read more

A debt of gratitude is in order for sharing this marvelous information.I have taken in numerous things from your post

digitech Classes

Lumen CMO strives to make the brand synonymous with anti-ageism

Read more

Latest Podcast

More podcasts

Sign in