How people buy brands

Kyle Ross

Kyle Ross is a strategist at TRP; a creative and media agency helping premium brands sell to more people, for more money.

Andrew Ehrenberg was a giant in the field of marketing science. He believed scientific methods could reveal law-like patterns of how people buy. In this post, I summarise one of Ehrenberg’s most important discoveries and its implications on how people buy brands.  

The unique selling proposition (USP), has long been embedded in marketing and advertising development. Popularised by Rosser Reeves in the 1960s, it requires a brand to find a unique difference to own in order to be bought. “Advertising is the art of getting a unique selling proposition into the heads of the most people at the lowest possible cost.”   

Nice in theory, but Ehrenberg debunked this concept by carrying out a series of studies using panel data. What were the findings?  

Differentiation isn’t key  

The first is people don’t have differentiated reasons for choosing brands.  

Users of brands endorse the same attributes as users of competing brands. Simply put, I like my brand for the same reasons you like your brand.  

If brand differences were the reason why people buy, you’d expect brand knowledge would be evenly distributed across all of a brand’s customer base. But it’s not. About 20 per cent of a brand’s customer base holds 40 per cent of the knowledge. The remaining brand knowledge is spread across 80 per cent of its customer base. Some people know a lot about a brand, but the majority (80 per cent) know very little. But they still buy.  

This undermines much of the received wisdom we have around having something unique and ownable to say about a brand. This matters a lot.  

Because our quest for difference leads marketers to stretch the truth so we can find something the competition does not and cannot say. It leads to advertising that is heavy handed and logical, at the expense of being interesting and enjoyable.  

Differentiation does exist, but it’s not a cure-all. Nor is it the biggest driver of brand growth. Why? Because people don’t care that much for brands. And they don’t spend much time thinking about brands. Brands at their best act like shortcuts, letting people avoid thinking entirely.  

Salience: A brand’s best source of growth  

So if differentiation isn’t the driver of growth, then what?      

There’s a huge amount of research to show growth can be predicted by measuring brand salience: The ability for a brand to be thought of in a buying situation.  

Salience is about the quality and quantity of brand associations people have of a brand. So if brand A has five million people to whom the brand is salient, and brand B has one million, A will be bought five times more.  

As Ehrenberg explained, ‘each brand’s customers do not look at their brand being very different. Instead, what differs is the number of people to whom the brand is salient’.  

Paul Feldwick writes in The Anatomy of Humbug: Thinking Differently About Advertising, ‘why might it be that people tend to prefer and choose the brands that are most ‘top of mind’? The so called ‘availability heuristic’ states that things we think of first or can picture most vividly are assumed to be most common and important.  

Applied to brands, this implies that people assume the brand that comes to mind first is likely to be the biggest and most popular.’  

You don’t need to find something unique and different to say. What you need is a way to say it differently. Tell a good story, create a long running joke, or use music to stir the emotions. The right music can boost ad effectiveness by +20 per cent, and can easily determine if an ad pays for itself.  

By freeing your communication from the shackles of differentiation, brands are liberated to find creative ways to be noticed, interesting and memorable; for more people. Because if you’re easy to think of, you’ll be easy to buy.  

Lessons

  • Don’t assume your advertising needs a unique selling message. It doesn’t
  • Don’t just persuade people with facts: There’s nothing logical about a meerkat selling you insurance, but it is interesting and memorable
  • Instead of differentiation, think distinctiveness: music, characters, celebrities, animals, taglines and advertising style go a long way toward driving salience
  • Remember that brands become big and profitable by building weak ties with the many, not strong ties to the few
  • Remember: Grow your brand salience and you will grow your brand

References

Kantar Millward Brown/BrandZ equity data and Kantar Worldpanel behavioural data
P Feldwick, “The Anatomy of Humbug: How To Think Differently About Advertising”, 2015
M Weigel, “The Liberation of Magic: How Marketing Science Opens Up Creative Opportunity”, 2013
J Scriven and G Goodhardt, “The Ehrenberg Legacy: Lessons in Buying Behaviour, Television, Brand Perception, Advertising and Pricing”, Journal of Advertising Research Vol. 52 2012
J Scriven, N Barnard and A Ehrenberg, “Differentiation or Salience”, Journal of Advertising Research Vol. 37 1997
B Sharp, “How Brands Grow: What Marketers Don’t Know”, 2010

L Binet and S Carter, “How Not To Plan: 66 Ways To Screw It Up”, 2018




Tags: brand strategy, Ehrenberg-Bass Institute

Show Comments

Featured Whitepapers

State of the CMO 2019

CMO’s State of the CMO is an annual industry research initiative aimed at understanding how ...

More whitepapers

Blog Posts

Why defining brand strategy is vital to capitalising on quick wins

Big brands were once protected from small brands by high barriers to entry. Big brands had the resources to employ big agencies, to crack big ideas and to invest in big campaigns. They had the luxury of time to debate strategies and work on long-term innovation pipelines. Retailers used to partner with big brands.

Troy McKinnna

Co-founder, Agents of Spring, Calm & Stormy

3 ways to leverage the talents of your team to avoid disruption

​According to the World Economic Forum in its most recent The Future of Jobs report, the most important skills for the future are not technical, task-oriented skills, but higher-order skills such as creativity, social influence, active learning, and analytical thinking.

Gihan Perera

Futurist, leadership consultant

CMOs, it’s time to stop squandering customer attention

Businesses continue to highly value the attention they buy through paid media, yet at the same time, many continue to disregard and under-value opportunities to connect with customers using their owned media.

Well written Vanessa!! Agreed with your view that human experience is marketing's next frontier. Those businesses who are focused on the ...

Clyde Griffith

Forget customer experience, human experience is marketing's next frontier

Read more

Great tips for tops skills need to develop and stay competitive

Nick

The top skills needed to stay competitive in a rapidly changing workforce

Read more

The popularity of loyalty programs is diminishing, though I'd say it is because customers are savvy enough to recognise when a loyalty pr...

Heather

It’s time for marketers to rethink their approach to ‘loyalty’

Read more

Thanks Nadia for sharing this blog. It has really useful and amazing information about Salesforce Commerce Cloud and digital engagement w...

Holly Smith

Adidas taps data and technology smarts to build personalised digital engagement with consumers

Read more

clearly someone who's jealous and only comments from the safety of being behind their keyboard

Peter Sibson

The purpose of purpose - Brand science - CMO Australia

Read more

Latest Podcast

More podcasts

Sign in