Companies don’t have policies to disrupt traditional business models: Forrester’s McQuivey

The c-level leadership team will face a challenging 2015 figuring out how to provide a better experience to customers, said Forrester's James L. McQuivey

Forrester's James L. McQuivey
Forrester's James L. McQuivey

Many companies have not developed the policies they need to build digital relationships with consumers and significantly alter their traditional business models.

That’s according to James L. McQuivey, vice-president and principal at Forrester, keynote speaker at the Executive Connections event on ‘Developing Your Digital Intelligence’, produced by CMO, CIO and ADMA.

“It’s an economic issue about serving your customers more efficiently through whatever devices they happen to have,” McQuivey told attendees. “This is not easy – companies have to change the way they think on a couple of levels."

Companies need to ask if they have a base level of energy or excitement to create digital initiatives, the required skills, and importantly, the organisational policies to ensure these programs succeed, McQuivey said.

According to Forrester research, 32 per cent of organisations don’t felt able to disrupt themselves in the face of digital change.

In addition, according to the analyst firm’s Assess Your Digital Disruption Readiness Now report, only half say they have the policies and business practices in place to adapt to the changes digital throws at their organisation. Alarmingly, that figure dropped to 24 per cent across staff working within the business, excluding leaders. This is despite the fact that 89 per cent of organisations see a significant opportunity for digital tools and experiences to change the way they serve customers.

McQuivey said the leadership team – the CEO, CMO and CIO – will face a challenging 2015 as they try to figure out what to do about digital disruption while the customer waits for a better experience.

He also called on c-level executives to work towards putting the customer at the centre of innovation efforts.

“Ask the customer what they need next … what is it that they want from me, how can I give it to them, and what would it take to give it to them?

“Let the CMO – who understands the customer experience – identify what would need to be done, even if it stresses the business model, but then respect the CIO’s need to do it the right way,” he said.

This is not difficult if organisations do the simple thing and put the customer first, McQuivey said.

“If we don’t agree about what the customer wants then we need to have a good conversation. But once we agree on what the customer wants … it’s about how do we get this done,” he said.

Chief digital officer can add unnecessary complexity

Meanwhile, adding a chief digital officer (CDO) into the mix – intended to be a bridge between the CIO and CMO – could introduce unnecessary complexity to executive teams, McQuivey claimed.

“There’s a good theory that suggests every time you add a person, you are adding all the possible interactions between that person and all the other people,” he said. “And as a result, you’ve added 20 per cent more people to the c-suite but 200 per cent more complexity.”

McQuivey agreed there are reasons for why an organisation may want to appoint a CDO, including as a way to signal to the business that it is taking digital strategy seriously.

“But in the long run, the CMO has to be a digitally-minded person and the CIO has to be a digital strategy-minded person, not just a technologically-minded person,” he said.

Creating digital relationships

McQuivey said an interesting force is coalescing and it’s the concept of digital relationships.

“The first thing that people think about when they think about how technology is changing their lives is ‘the gadgets’,” he commented. “But when you ask them to think about one layer up, what is it about those devices and gadgets that is changing their lives? It’s items, it’s the appstore. It’s not the Fitbit step tracker, it’s the software that helps me track my steps.

“When you move one layer up you realise that software enables a new kind of relationship with the customer and that software, is what creates the future platform over which you will relate to your customers.”

McQuivey highlighted Amazon and Apple as examples of companies that understand this. Amazon has sold 90 million Kindles and Apple around 260 million iPads globally, he said.

“If iPad nation were a country, it would be closing on Indonesia at the world’s fourth-largest country sometime in the next quarter. It will be by this time next year the third largest country in the world having surpassed the US,” he said.

The more complicated the industry, the more necessary it is to create digital relationships, McQuivey continued.

“Uber isn’t necessarily having the best brand experience here in Australia but it’s a company that is doing a great job at building two kinds of relationships – one with the driver and one with the rider – and connecting those two in a seamless manner,” he said.

And it’s the data that’s driving that level of interaction and value. McQuivey pointed out some users would have boycotted thumbprint identification 10 years ago as a protest against technology vendors collecting that level of personal information just to use a piece of technology.

“Now, we are grateful for it because the digital relationship that this enables is valuable to us. It’s giving us this digitally-disruptive life that we enjoy so much,” he said.

Follow CMO on Twitter: @CMOAustralia, take part in the CMO Australia conversation on LinkedIn: CMO Australia, join us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CMOAustralia, or check us out on Google+: google.com/+CmoAu

Join the CMO newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments

Supporting Association

Blog Posts

Why customer experience driven growth is set to take off

Our overall brand perceptions are invariably shaped by our experiences. And loyal customer relationships can be severed in moments by a negative service interaction.

Consistency and conversation: How branding and advertising can work better together

Advertising and branding are two of the most visible outputs of marketing, which is why getting them right is so important. However, too often the line between branding and advertising becomes blurred. This means advertising activity can be out of sync with brand, resulting in poor results for both functions.

Dan Ratner

managing director, uberbrand

Putting your brand on the Love Index

How much do your customers love your brand, product or service?And more importantly, why?

Bronwyn van der Merwe

Managing director, Accenture Interactive

Someone needs a swift kick up the bum for such an idiotic idea.

random

​Why a degree is no longer enough to get you hired as a skilled marketer

Read more

The frequent flyer programs are the new profit machines for airlines all over the world, as they have morphed to be mass marketing machin...

Steve@iFLYflat

Velocity frequent flyers program strong performer in mixed half-year for Virgin

Read more

Hi Jennifer, thanks for sharing these info regarding the digital marketing trends.I've created a related video to this topic, would you m...

Fabio Carry

Predictions: 17 digital marketing trends for 2017

Read more

Great news. Marketing automation can be very useful for companies at various stages of development. With so many tools out there it's bet...

Ben

How HBF rolled out marketing automation in eight months

Read more

I read a report that the business sector in Australia as a whole have yet to fully harness and see the proactive change that predictive a...

Alex Martin

Report: Predictive analytics, IoT, machine learning battle it out for marketing dollars

Read more

Latest Podcast

More podcasts

Sign in