Google should be regulated like telcos and electricity companies, say rivals

Market testing of Google remedies ends Thursday

Companies who have been assessing Google's planned remedies to anti-competitive practices called on the European Commission on Tuesday to reject them and to consider regulating Internet search.

Google has been under investigation by the Commission since November 2010 after rivals accused the search giant of setting its algorithm to direct users to its own services by reducing the visibility of competing websites and services. It was also accused of content-scraping and imposing contractual restrictions that prevent advertisers from moving their online campaigns to rival search engines.

On April 25 Google proposed specific measures to address these complaints and rivals and interested parties were invited by the Commission to "market test" them. That testing period ends on Thursday.

However, Michael Weber, CEO of Hot Map, said the testing period had not been long enough. "You cannot do a serious scientific study in one month," he said. Weber and others asked the Commission for a two- to three-month extension, but were only granted four extra weeks.

Weber was unimpressed with Google's remedies and said that a formal statement of objections from the European Commission's antitrust department would have been better than the current negotiations.

Google has proposed to label its preferred links to its own sites in search results. But publishers say that this will mislead consumers into thinking these were somehow tailor-made results for search queries and interests, thereby causing even greater harm to competition.

Google also proposes to include links to rival search engines for specialist restaurant search results that generate revenue for Google. Google's paid-for services would be separated from general search and treated more like advertising.

Finally, Google has agreed to remove exclusivity provisions from all future contracts and any legacy advertising contracts and will offer tools to prevent Web scraping by allowing content owners to opt out.

But many complainants who met in Brussels on Tuesday to present their position on the remedies said that search is such an important Internet tool that it should be regulated like a telecommunications or electric utilities.

"Everyone relies on it," said Weber. "Unfortunately no one planning the digital single market thought that a single company would control access to the Internet." Google has 95 percent of the search market in the E.U.

Thomas Vinje, legal counsel and spokesman for FairSearch Europe, which represents some of the complainants, said that in putting Google's remedies forward for market testing, the Commission made clear that it thought they were "palatable" and "worthy of discussion." But he, too, called on the Commission to reject the remedies.

Many complainants said the remedies don't go far enough since they won't apply to redirected searches to new top level domains such as .fly or .hotel.

Others thought that the remedies wouldn't make much difference to Google anyway. "Google will exploit the loopholes. Look at what they do with regard to tax," said Kate Sutton, commercial director of Streetmap.

Meanwhile hundreds of publishers and their trade associations wrote an open letter calling on Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia to reject Google's draft remedies completely.

"As a minimum requirement, Google must hold all services, including its own, to exactly the same standards, using exactly the same crawling, indexing, ranking, display and penalty algorithms," said one of the signatories, Helmut Heinen, president of the Federation of German Newspaper Publishers.

Feedback from the market test will be taken into account in the Commission's final analysis. However, it is the Commission that Google's remedies must satisfy, not any other party involved. If a solution isn't found, the Commission could still fine the company up to 10 percent of its annual global revenue.

Follow Jennifer on Twitter at @BrusselsGeek or email tips and comments to jennifer_baker@idg.com.

Join the CMO newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments

Supporting Association

Blog Posts

Against Net Promoter: A new way of interpreting the customer data deluge

One thing that frustrates marketers is the sloppy use of digital research.

Jason Juma-Ross

lead partner, PwC Digital Intelligence

How to better value your data

As digital marketing techniques matured over the last few years, the momentum to collect and utilise data has rapidly gathered pace.

Mark Cameron

CEO, Working Three

5 essentials for leading digital transformation

While each business will have a unique digital transformation agenda, there are five essentials every CMO can pick up and excel at to ensure a smooth transformation.

Jacki James

strategic planner, Zuni

You think people are annoyed with marketing messages now? Wait til they start getting them on their pill bottles. That's not "engagement...

Len Diamoond

Marketo CEO: Mass media is dead; embrace engagement marketing

Read more

I'd love to hear an update on how this trial went and any stats that are being released. Have looked around and doesn't appear to be anyt...

Valentina Borbone

Melbourne Cricket Ground to give away pies during Beacon trial

Read more

Thanks

Veri kurtarma

How data is driving the customers of a lifetime for BaubleBar

Read more

I love the article and feel it's right on. Only thing I don't agree with is ..'“If a marketer starts to pigeon-hole themselves as just b...

Scott Sundheim

CMO to CEO: Virgin’s David Scribner talks growth

Read more

Kind of ironic this was posted on the day that Target closed in my home town. They obviously didn't get customer experience in Canada.

Carol Wain

Target: Emotional social vital to customer experience management

Read more

Sign in