Is media agency transparency a global issue or a local one?

Darren Woolley

Darren Woolley is Founder and MD of TrinityP3, an independent strategic marketing management consultancy that assists marketers, advertisers and procurement with agency search and selection, agency engagement and alignment and agency monitoring and benchmarking. With his background as an analytical scientist and creative problem solver, Darren brings unique insights and learnings to the marketing process. He is considered a global thought leader on agency remuneration, search and selection and relationship optimisation.

The recent controversy around buying irregularities at MediaCom Sydney left many convinced it was a one-off incident, and that we should all get back to business as usual.

This is exactly what the media agencies and their holding company owners would have you believe. They could even go so far as to reject any suggestion that this problem is more common than we think, because they have no interest in dealing with the underlying condition that caused this mess in the first place.

In saying that, this problem is not one that can be solved by media agencies alone. Everyone involved has had a part to play in creating this problem so everybody needs to share in the responsibility of making this right.

Who controls these local entities?

Let’s face it, AVBs and rebates are a worldwide practice. MediaCom Sydney is a regional entity of a global parent company and there are more than a few of these global parents in this industry. The global and regional hubs, where P&L from local markets feed into, control these local entities so it would be a fair assumption that revenue streams and P&L structures are standardised to some degree across the board.

That said, the cultures in local markets, along with the differing degrees of standard business practices and corporate governance, may be worthy of some consideration. There is the appearance of high levels of due diligence with some and nothing at all with others.

Nonetheless, this is still a global problem. However, if we were talking about China or India, how much would this problem resonate if media agencies carried on this way?

There have already been some US heavyweights talking about this, which no doubt alarmed the largest market in the western world. Talk was such that Pivotal Research, a leading investment advisor, has seen fit to downgrade this category because of this controversy.

Who regulates the Australian market?

Certainly, regulation in the Australian market is lacking. Since this situation has surfaced, media auditors have confessed their reliance on agencies for data. There has been denials of a problem from the self-funded industry groups that manage and control self-regulation. Then there are advertisers too afraid to say anything in case their limited control over the vast amounts of money invested in media is revealed.

Unfortunately, many markets are in the same boat across the region, providing an even more fertile environment for this type of behaviour.

If it wasn’t for the procurement process of systematically driving reductions into agency compensation agreements, then this would not have been an issue. This outdated compensation structure pays for the cost of service provision, instead of the true value the media investment delivers to the advertiser. This cost, which has successfully been reduced by procurement, no longer makes up for the increasing complexity of media agency operations.

The reduction in fees has seen media agencies cutting costs by becoming increasingly reliant on their lower cost junior staff members. A media agency is often a pressurised environment. Relying on junior staff members without sufficient training can lead to careless decisions and shoddy work practices.

It’s worth remembering this entire thing happened because a few post-analysis reports were fluffed up by some buyers. All the rest – the debate about kick-backs, AVBs, value backs and so on – has been brought about by the press blow-up and John Steedman’s decision to make some more admissions.

The impact of commoditising conventional media agency services

Because the commoditisation of conventional media agency services has driven down long-established revenue streams, media agencies have had to stay ahead of the curve by diversifying. In future-proofing any business, diversifying services is natural but the commoditisation of core services has, to some extent, forced their hand.

If you think I’m suggesting that had agencies been paid better from the outset, AVBs or arbitrage wouldn’t have happened, you’d be mistaken. I am simply stating that shaping a transparent, value-based service model has not been helped by commoditisation. At the root of all of the problems that have surfaced since the MediaCom issue, is this mounting lack of transparency.

Based on my own experience, there is an increase in the number of advertisers who exhibit a lack of basic understanding around how media agencies actually operate. All things considered, this is simply not a very good place for any of us to be in.

Media industry regulation

Globally, this is a multi-billion dollar industry that deserves an appropriate level of regulation. Establishing an independent and global audit and code of ethics, something like Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, may be a step in the right direction and provide a consistent and global approach to transparency and accountability.

Of course, this would need to be enforced and regulated by an entity not funded by media agencies. It would require the setup of a global and independently funded body that would drive and oversee it to make sure media agencies, their trading entities and advertisers, deliver the required level of accountability and transparency across markets and within categories.

Marketers would be required to undertake independent and meticulous financial audits of their media agencies. And by that, we don’t mean media rate audits, which are what the industry is currently passing off as audits.

The issue of agency compensation

There also needs to be a change in the way agencies are remunerated. Advertisers should take the focus off costs and reward, and remunerate their agencies for the value of delivered media. The value might be media that is procured on behalf of the advertiser, or more importantly, it could be the value delivered by the media itself such as revenue, market share or sales.

At the end of the day, media agency staff and their clients must improve their understanding of the media value chain and also receive training on how value is created, delivered and lost.

And for advertisers, it is not enough to expect media agencies to make these changes. In a lot of ways, media agencies have basically conformed to the cost demands of advertisers. In the process, they have progressively gained more value from media owners.

Is it such a big ask that an appropriate level of regulation be put in place? After all, this is a multi-billion dollar global industry.

Tags: mediacom, agency relationships, media agency

Show Comments

Featured Whitepapers

State of the CMO 2020

CMO’s State of the CMO is an annual industry research initiative aimed at understanding how ...

More whitepapers

Latest Videos

More Videos

It's an interesting direction, and fair play that they've backed what their service differentiator in the market is. It's a bit clunky bi...


Versa launches bot-activated website

Read more

Algorithms that can make sense of unstructured data is the future. It's great to see experts in the field getting together to discuss AI.

Sumit Takim

In pictures: Harnessing AI for customer engagement - CMO roundtable Melbourne

Read more

Real digital transformation requires reshaping the way the business create value for customers. Achieving this requires that organization...

ravi H

10 lessons Telstra has learnt through its T22 transformation

Read more


Lillian Juliet

How Winedirect has lifted customer recency, frequency and value with a digital overhaul

Read more

Having an effective Point of Sale system implemented in your retail store can streamline the transactions and data management activities....

Sheetal Kamble

​Jurlique’s move to mobile POS set to enhance customer experience

Read more

Blog Posts

Brand storytelling lessons from Singapore’s iconic Fullerton hotel

In early 2020, I had the pleasure of staying at the newly opened Fullerton Hotel in Sydney. It was on this trip I first became aware of the Fullerton’s commitment to brand storytelling.

Gabrielle Dolan

Business storytelling leader

You’re doing it wrong: Emotion doesn’t mean emotional

If you’ve been around advertising long enough, you’ve probably seen (or written) a slide which says: “They won’t remember what you say, they’ll remember how you made them feel.” But it’s wrong. Our understanding of how emotion is used in advertising has been ill informed and poorly applied.

Zac Martin

Senior planner, Ogilvy Melbourne

Why does brand execution often kill creativity?

The launch of a new brand, or indeed a rebrand, is a transformation to be greeted with fanfare. So why is it that once the brand has launched, the brand execution phase can also be the moment at which you kill its creativity?

Rich Curtis

CEO, FutureBrand A/NZ

Sign in