As social platforms step up their response to cultural issues such as US violence, elections and #blacklivesmatter, we ask: What does it mean for brands undertaking social media marketing in 2021?
GroupM is a founding member of the GARM and Mindshare Melbourne MD, Chris Solomon, was positive about the significant steps social platforms are making towards taking a stance against issues challenging the global community. The recent suspension of the POTUS accounts on Twitter and Facebook following the Capitol Hill riots is an acute example, he said.
“The balance of offering an open platform and becoming politically involved is a hard one for the social platforms,” Solomon told CMO. “They have tried to stay historically independent from it, however as we have stepped further into a digital world, the issues within society have been able to escalate and spread more widely.
“It is unchartered territory in many ways, but we see first-hand they are constantly reviewing their stance, prioritising transparency and working to take down accounts and groups that break their code of conduct.”
As was stated by Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey, in his defence of the ongoing ban of President Trump from its platform, unprecedented circumstances have led to unprecedented action.
“I do not celebrate or feel pride in our having to ban @realDonaldTrump from Twitter, or how we got here. After a clear warning we’d take this action, we made a decision with the best information we had based on threats to physical safety both on and off Twitter,” he stated on 14 January in a Twitter post.
“I believe this was the right decision for Twitter. We faced an extraordinary and untenable circumstance, forcing us to focus all of our actions on public safety. Offline harm as a result of online speech is demonstrably real, and what drives our policy and enforcement above all.”
Against this, the value social platforms provide society should not be forgotten, Solomon continued: Being able to connect with anyone, anywhere and spread/do good on a global scale.
“There will always be groups that want to take advantage of this for the wrong reasons. It is encouraging to see the social platforms doing more to stop this and stamp it out,” he said.
“In 2020, we also saw usage and behaviours change, and in many cases accelerate. The opportunity they present for getting brand messages in front of consumers has only increased as their member base has and tools for placement have evolved and become smarter.”
Of course, brand-safe environments are key for brands and the agencies working with them, and Solomon cited very stringent brand safety guidelines and protocols are being employed to minimise risk as much as possible.
“But the more the platforms support society and the challenges we are presented with, the more brands will be comfortable to spend advertising dollars with them,” he said. “Globally, brands have become more and more vocal in their stance towards social issues that impact their customers and their employees. So I am not surprised brands such as Unilever are now making their way back onto the platform.”
Ogilvy lead social creative, Peter Galmes, saw Unilever and other big brands returning to social as a positive message to other big brands - even as they weigh up whether social giants have done enough to meet their individual company brand safety and social purpose guidelines.
“Social media platforms have, to date, been wildly inconsistent with the type of content they will strike or ban for a brand or user versus a politician,” Galmes commented. “They have made a significant step forward with the Trump bans, which I think will help them be seen as more regulated advertising platforms in 2021 with the same rules for posting content whether you’re a brand, user or a politician.”
While he saw social media platforms taking a starting position, Galmes believed there’s a long road to go. He specifically highlighted inconsistencies around responsiveness. For example, Facebook took 69 days to ban ‘Stop the Steal’ content being posted.
“But on the flip side, we saw Amazon, Apple and Google shut their servers to apps that are used by extremists almost instantly. It is a fast-moving problem with daily issues and the playbook is still being written,” Galmes said.
For Digivizer CEO, Emma Lo Russo, it’s “contentious” whether recent platform changes were influenced most by individual user boycotts, the attention of governments, or big company boycotts. Her personal view is that it’s individual behaviour that provides the most influential impetus for greatest change.
"It is not surprising to see Unilever or other brands reverse their decision and to invest in platforms like Facebook again. The reality remains: Investing in brand is important, and brands need to invest where their customers and audiences are,” Lo Russo said.
“That means social media. What's changed over the past six months is brands and consumers have worked out, perhaps more than before, that engagement, revenue and loyalty occur when values are meaningfully shared.
"Brands always need to align great content to build brand and consideration. They need to balance staying relevant and real, communicating the values that align to customers. What's right for an automotive firm will be different for a soap manufacturer.”
For Solomon, 2020 and the COVID-19 pandemic has given every one of us to gain perspective within our lives. “The hope is we can continue to take positive learnings and actions from it, not only the social platforms but the whole media industry,” he said.
In WPP and GroupM’s case, this is reflected in taking a very strong stance towards supporting diversity, inclusion and standing against hate speech. “This comes from the top down and having this narrative consistently supported is exactly what is needed in today’s world,” Solomon said.
Mindshare globally is also taking the step towards more responsible media and doing more to support both society and the environment by “using the voice we have”, he said. Again, GARB has a huge role to play in this.
Co-founder and chief digital officer of Sydney media agency Kaimera, Trent McMillan, saw Unilever’s step as signalling to other larger brands that it is safe to return to the platform. But he noted locally a lack of advertisers that boycotted Facebook anyway, and pointed to the huge reliance SMBs have on social platforms.
McMillan agreed further control is required within the platform to assist brands to protect themselves when advertising on them. However, he warned this will come at a cost, either in the form of hard transactional costs such as a third-party tech mediator, or from scalability and limitations on audience size, making campaigns less efficient/effective.
“We should expect continued scrutiny in 2021, as the platform struggles to find the balance between legislating against hate speech and maintaining freedom of expression and free speech,” McMillan predicted. “One thing often overlooked is that there needs to be a ‘buyer beware’ sticker when advertising on these platforms. We need to remember the bulk of content found on social platforms is user-generated, so there will always be an element of ‘brand safety’ to be mindful of.”
What COVID-19 has shown is the reliance we all have on social media platforms, “not just as a place to watch content but as a place to help us feel part of a community,” Galmes said.
“It has also amplified the issues with these platforms. I think the platforms have taken steps to start being more socially responsible and we will see them continue down this road in 2021,” Galmes said. “We will also see huge innovation in this area and new platforms starting to take dominance like TikTok and Signal, which again will lead to new issues around responsibility and responsiveness.”
What there’s no room for in 2021 is fake brand, fake positions or the absence of any position, Lo Russo warned.
“Brands and individuals who are genuinely committed to creating great customer experiences and delivering great value within a broader set of shared and authentic values, and who use data to understand and engage with customers, will continue to do well,” she added.
Follow CMO on Twitter: @CMOAustralia, take part in the CMO conversation on LinkedIn: CMO ANZ, follow our regular updates via CMO Australia's Linkedin company page, or join us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CMOAustralia.
In the third and final episode of our 3-part CMO50 video series exploring modern marketing and why it’s become a matter of trust, we’re delighted to be joined by Telstra’s former CMO and now digital services and sales executive, Jeremy Nicholas, and Adobe VP Marketing Asia-Pacific and Japan, Duncan Egan.
Flash back to the classic film, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. Television-obsessed Mike insists on becoming the first person to be ‘sent by Wonkavision’, dematerialising on one end, pixel by pixel, and materialising in another space. His cinematic dreams are realised thanks to rash decisions as he is shrunken down to fit the digital universe, followed by a trip to the taffy puller to return to normal size.
Why is it there is no shortage of leadership development materials, yet outstanding leadership is so rare? Despite having access to so many leadership principles, tools, systems and processes, why is it so hard to develop and improve as a leader?
As a nation united by sport, brands are beginning to learn money alone won’t talk without aligned values and action. If recent events with major leagues and their players have shown us anything, it’s the next generation of athletes are standing by what they believe in – and they won’t let their values be superseded by money.
