Report: Tackling bad advertising experiences

Latest CMO Club report looks at how to improve ad experiences for customers

We’ve long known consumers hate bad ad experiences. It also turns out marketers do too. But while marketers are aware of the problems bad experiences cause, it may be that little will change until marketing team structures change.

A research project by US-based marketing leadership community The CMO Club, in conjunction with creative management platform developer, Thunder, investigated the opinions of its B2C members regarding what makes a bad ad experience.

The resulting CMO Club Solution Guide, Solving Bad Ad Experiences, found that relevancy, frequency and consistency (or a lack thereof) were the top three factors that most impacted ad experience.

More specifically, when asked what would most impact an ad experience, 78 per cent nominated showing ‘ads for products the customer already bought’ as being inexcusable – well ahead of other annoyances such ‘ads that force users to interact with the brand before getting content’, or ‘getting too many ads from the same brand’.

Ad fatigue was still seen as a problem however, with 71 per cent suggesting that frequency capping was important to the ad experience. Surprisingly however, 60 per cent lacked confidence in the accuracy of frequency reporting for cross-device or cross-channel advertising.

And while 95 per cent believed personalisation improved ad experiences, more than 75 per cent still nominated ‘knowing the customer’ as being the biggest obstacle to delivering a better experience. This was despite 41 per cent indicating they already personalised digital advertising, with another 53 per cent planning to do so in the next 12 months.

“There is broad consensus around what makes a bad ad experience, but that doesn’t necessarily mean people have the confidence in the technology to solve it, or they haven’t taken the steps yet to do it,” says Thunder’s co-founder and CEO, Victor Wong.

Beneath these results however he says the survey reveals the extent to which marketers have adopted a people-based approach, rather than focusing on devices and channels. This means that many brands have yet to invest in CRM and personalisation technology.

“This really points to the under-penetration of a people-based approach within the marketing organisation,” Wong says. “Everyone is talking about moving towards it, but we have a long way to go to get there.”

Wong says for many marketers the barrier is an organisational design which reflects a world where there was no expectation to know who you customer was.

“We need to move organisations from these different media-specific setups to really a customer-centric team,” Wong says. “You don’t need to break up your team based on the marketing tactic or channel any more. And a lot of organisations are beginning to recognise that.”

 Wong says he sees this problem as being most prevalent in consumer packaged goods (CPG) makers, who never traditionally sold directly to customers and hence have often not invested in creating a CRN practice.

“But now they are up against these fast-growing CPG brands that do sell direct to customers and do have a distribution channel,” Wong says. “So if you think the marketing organisation of 20 years ago still makes sense today, you really have to wonder how you can ignore an entire distribution channel that didn’t exist 20 years ago.”

Follow CMO on Twitter: @CMOAustralia, take part in the CMO conversation on LinkedIn: CMO ANZ, join us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CMOAustralia, or check us out on Google+:google.com/+CmoAu

 

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments
cmo-xs-promo

Latest Videos

More Videos

Thanks for your feedback, Rabi. While we introduced the ROO concept using a marketing example, I also believe that it is pertinent to man...

Iggy Pintado

Introducing Return on Outcome (ROO) - Brand science - CMO Australia

Read more

Thanks for your insight, Philip. Return On Outcome (ROO) requires balanced thinking with the focus on outcomes as opposed to returns.

Iggy Pintado

Introducing Return on Outcome (ROO) - Brand science - CMO Australia

Read more

Beautiful article.

Hodlbaba

15 brands jumping into NFTs

Read more

"Blue" is really gorgeous and perfectly imitates a human customer support operator. Personally, I won't order a chatbot development for m...

Nate Ginsburg

Why the newest member of BT’s contact centre is a chatbot

Read more

As today’s market changes rapidly, the tools we use change, and it is important to adapt to those changes to continue to succeed in busin...

Anna Duda

Report: 10 digital commerce trends here to stay

Read more

Blog Posts

How the pandemic revealed the antidote to marketing’s image problem

What does marketing truly ‘own’ in most organisations? Brand and campaigns, definitely. Customer experience? That remains contested ground.

Murray Howe

Founder, The Markitects

Still pursuing a 360-degree view of the customer?

On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” It may have been true in 1993 when this caption to a Peter Steiner cartoon appeared in the New Yorker. But after 30 years online, it’s no longer the case.

Agility in 2022

Only the agile will survive and thrive in this environment and that’s why in 2022, agility will need to be a whole-business priority.

Sam McConnell

Melbourne bureau chief, Alpha Digital

Sign in