What Facebook's miscalculated metrics mean for marketers

Facebook again admitted that it provided inaccurate metrics to its advertising and publishing partners, but the company also promised a number of fixes to the problem.

For the second time in as many months, Facebook admitted it misreported the metrics it provides to publishers and marketers to measure reach and engagement on their posts. The world's largest social network again blamed "bugs" for the discrepancies that resulted in undercounting or over-reporting of metrics related to marketers' posts and video views, as well as the time spent on publishers' Instant Articles. In late September, Facebook told its marketer customers that it had over-reported video metrics for two years.

Facebook said the new errors do not impact billing, and it has implemented new measures, including independent review and third-party verification, to allay concerns among the company's more than 3 million advertisers and publishers.

Marketers lack leverage to pressure Facebook

The latest revelations likely weigh on the confidence of Facebook's publishing and marketing partners, but they don't have much leverage to pressure Facebook, according to Jenny Sussin, research director at Gartner. "This may give them more negotiating room with any Facebook enterprise contracts for ads, but when the network itself is so valuable it's not like people can leave and go somewhere else," she says.

Jessica Liu, senior analyst at Forrester Research, expects these problems to continue, and the company's perceived value among marketers will diminish as a result of metrics snafus, she says. "Marketers believed that Facebook was effective but now, because calculations are misaligned, marketers aren't sure of Facebook's value and regress to operating in a social media black box circa 2010."

Facebook will lose marketers' trust as it admits to more of these issues but, and Facebook will have to assume more responsibility as it grows ever larger in reach and influence, according to Liu. "To regain trust, Facebook must incorporate data transparency and governance."

Facebook promises third-party verification of metrics

Facebook said it will provide new data for display ads from third-party measurement firms, such as Moat and Integral Ad Science. The company also plans to partner with Nielsen to quantify on-demand and live-video views. Finally, Facebook said it plans to organize a "measurement council" of outside marketers and advertising executives to provide more frequent updates about the accuracy of its measurement systems.

Marketers have every right to feel disillusioned about Facebook's lack of transparency, despite its effectiveness in connecting brands with customers, but those marketers are also to blame, according to Liu. They shouldn't have taken Facebook's metrics at face value, Liu says, and she criticizes the ad industry for following Facebook's nonstandard framework for metrics. "Marketers must do a better job of asking fundamental questions about their metrics," Liu says. "Basic accuracy questions will create clarity and engender confidence."

The entire ad industry is culpable for measuring "superficial metrics" for years, as well. according to Gartner's Sussin. "As we've always said, volume is nice but actually getting a customer to your site, filling out a lead form or making a purchase" are the outcomes companies should be tracking, she says. "Facebook insights can get you part of the way, but if that was all you were ever measuring the odds are you didn't know what the real impact of your social strategy was anyway."

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments

Blog Posts

Why are we dubious about deep learning?

The prospect of deep learning gives those of us in the industry something to get really excited about, and something to be nervous about, at the same time.

Katja Forbes

Founder and chief, sfyte

Why you can’t afford to fail at CX in 2019

In 1976 Apple launched. The business would go on to change the game, setting the bar for customer experience (CX). Seamless customer experience and intuitive designs gave customers exactly what they wanted, making other service experiences pale in comparison.

Damian Kernahan

Founder and CEO, Proto Partners

Natural born leaders

Many business and marketing managers progressing to leadership positions face evolving their focus from operational matters to strategic decision making and planning.

Jean-Luc Ambrosi

Author, marketer

Do you need a loan to pay off your credit or debit? Do you need financial help to set up your own business? Do you need a loan to carry o...

NORA

Facebook: Friction is costing Australian businesses $29 billion a year

Read more

Thanks for writing about chatbots. Definitely bots have the exciting future when it comes to customer engagement, transactional and conve...

Sanket Nair

7 businesses successfully implementing chatbots

Read more

Interesting article but what about the employees? There needs to be access to quick cash for everyone involved lest we have yet another '...

Joel Pencer

Suncorp outlines customer investments, digitisation as key to business improvement

Read more

Just printed out this Brad Howarth screed to read tomorrow. I need a good laugh once in a while. Or maybe shed some manly-man tears at th...

Larry A Singleton

What a diversity agenda has done for Kellogg's staff and innovation engagement

Read more

Morons. PC Nazis infiltrating and subverting every level in our lives.These scum have destroyed our education system.Read FrontPage Magaz...

Larry A Singleton

What a diversity agenda has done for Kellogg's staff and innovation engagement

Read more

Latest Podcast

More podcasts

Sign in