Apple plunges to No. 79 on Forbes innovative companies ranking

Google ranks higher at No. 47, but Microsoft doesn't even make the list

Apple's innovation problems were highlighted today when Forbes published its 2013 list of the world's most innovative companies and ranked Apple at No. 79.

Apple's plummet has been dramatic. In 2011, the first year Forbes issued its Most Innovative Companies list, which ranks 100 firms, Apple earned the No. 5 spot. Last year, the Cupertino, Calif. company dropped 21 positions to No. 26. But the 53-place plunge in 2013 was the biggest decline yet.

Forbes uses a complex algorithm to rank companies by what it calls an "innovation premium," which is the difference between market capitalization and a net present value of cash flows from existing businesses. The innovation premium also takes into account anticipated growth from the existing businesses within a company.

"Think of [the innovation premium] as the investor expectations built into the stock price," explained Bruce Ipbin, managing editor of Forbes, in an interview today. "Apple's ranking dropped because of what happened to the stock [price] in the last year. Its ranking is a proxy of what investors think of the future of the company."

Some companies are excluded from the list, including those in the mining and energy industries -- Forbes said their market values are tied to commodity prices rather than innovation metrics -- banks, which spend very little on research and development, and firms that have fewer than seven years of public financial data.

Facebook, for instance, would have made this year's top 10 if just 2012's financial data was used, but it was eliminated because it didn't meet the seven-year minimum.

At the top of the 2013 list was Salesforce.com, which has held the No. 1 spot for three years running. VMware was No. 3, Chinese search firm Baidu was No. 6, and Amazon.com was No. 7.

Apple rival Google was No. 47 this year, a fall from 2012's No. 24. In 2011, Google had the No. 7 spot.

"It's not necessarily true that Google's innovation has slowed down," said Ipbin, "but maybe investors think that driver-less cars won't pay off like search has."

Apple has collected criticism for nearly a year -- since its stock price peaked in September 2012 at just over $702 -- for what some have called a lack of innovation. That, say analysts, was triggered by the lack of a new product to follow 2007's iPhone and 2010's iPad, both which generate billions in revenue each quarter.

"Apple's already done so much," said Ipbin. "What could they do that would top the iPhone and iPad?"

But because investors -- and customers -- are always eager for something new, something so dynamic that it kick starts an entire industry, Apple's increasingly seen as stuck in the very profitable rut it made for itself.

Some major technology companies have never been on the Forbes list, including Microsoft and Intel, both of which spend a huge amount of money on research and development and have thousands of top engineers working on products, said Ipbin.

Forbes has published a lengthy explanation of its innovation ranking methodology and a supporting FAQ on its website.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer, on Google+ or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed. His email address is gkeizer@computerworld.com.

See more by Gregg Keizer on Computerworld.com.

Read more about it industry in Computerworld's IT Industry Topic Center.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments

Blog Posts

3 marketing mistakes to overcome when courting prospective customers

Marketing that urges respondents to ‘buy now’ is a little like asking someone to marry you on your first date. At any time, only 3 per cent of the market is looking for what you’re selling, so the chances of your date randomly being ‘The One’ is pretty slim.

Sabri Suby

Founder, King Kong

Why are we dubious about deep learning?

The prospect of deep learning gives those of us in the industry something to get really excited about, and something to be nervous about, at the same time.

Katja Forbes

Founder and chief, sfyte

Why you can’t afford to fail at CX in 2019

In 1976 Apple launched. The business would go on to change the game, setting the bar for customer experience (CX). Seamless customer experience and intuitive designs gave customers exactly what they wanted, making other service experiences pale in comparison.

Damian Kernahan

Founder and CEO, Proto Partners

Red Agency YouGov Galaxy Report, February 2019 Predictors Study. https://redagency.com.au/re...

Vanessa Skye Mitchell

DNA-based marketing: The next big thing?

Read more

RIP holden

Max Polding

Marketing professor: For Holden, brand nostalgia ain’t what it used to be

Read more

Where does the claim that 2 million Australians have tested come from ? Anecdotal information suggests that this is way off the mark.

David Andersen

DNA-based marketing: The next big thing?

Read more

Thank you for the info , being part of a digital marketing agency in kerala , this proved handy and get to know with upcoming trends. htt...

Dotz Web Technologies

Predictions: 9 digital marketing trends for 2019

Read more

So who then is correct? The Research or The skilled Digital people.

Anene

Report reveals Australia faces digital skills shortage

Read more

Latest Podcast

More podcasts

Sign in