Google, not Facebook, will lead the affinity brand advertising race, Forrester claims

Forrester analyst claims the development of a 'database of affinity' will change the brand advertising game

Google and not Facebook could lead the way in defining a ‘database of affinity’ that brings new rigour and understanding to brand advertising, a Forrester Research analyst has claimed.

In a new post for the analyst group entitled Why Google – not Facebook - will build the database of affinity, marketing analyst, Nate Elliott, said Google has the capabilities, tools and insights needed to understand a consumer’s affinity and measure it.

The concept of a ‘database of affinity’ was aired by Forrester Research in March as a way of cataloguing people’s tastes and preferences collected by observing their social behaviours on sites such as Facebook and Twitter.

In his post The database of affinity can bring discipline to brand marketing, as well as during a session at the recent South by Southwest conference (SXSW), Elliott pointed out affinity is different to intent because it is led by emotional motivation, expressed after a purchase is made, and remains relevant even after a search or purchase has been made to fulfil an immediate need.

Elliott claimed a database of affinity therefore needs to be viewed and utilised by marketers in a different way to the information relating to intent. However, once harnessed, it could bring the same rigour and discipline to brand advertising that the database of intentions brought to direct response.

Key to building such a database is affinity data from lots of sources, the ability to bring meaning to that data, and the brand ad units that will derive the best value from such data, he explained.

According to a report on AdWeek last October, Facebook has already been allowing a select group of marketers a sneak peek at their fans’ other affinities, such as brands, TV shows and music performers.

“When we started researching this topic, it seemed like a no-brainer that Facebook would best be able to offer marketers the database of affinity,” Elliott stated. “But the more we looked at the facts, the more obvious it became that…Google is the company most likely to bring marketers a usable database of affinity.”

Why? Elliott said Google possesses a broader set of affinity data that most people think, tracking 800 million YouTube visitors, the social connections and share habits of its 500 million Gmail users, and its Google search index.

Google also has the capability to dynamically evaluate enormous amounts of data not only through its own branded businesses but also through ad serving arm, DoubleClick.

What do you think of Forrester’s concept of a ‘database of affinity’? Register as a CMO subscriber for free to submit your comments below, or email the editor.

Follow CMO on Twitter: @CMOAustralia or take part in the CMO Australia conversation on LinkedIn: CMO Australia.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments

Blog Posts

5 cornerstones of a strong digital culture

Creating a strong company culture may sound like a daunting task, but it’s actually pretty straightforward. In fact, company culture is created in exactly the same fashion as a religion or democracy. Behaviours created from the organisation’s inception are reinforced over time by leadership, attracting like-minded people and eventually reaching critical mass to become an accepted ‘truth’.

Anthony Stevens

Founder and CEO, Digital Asset Ventures

Should you rebuild your company’s tech stack in blockchain?

The question I get asked most regularly these days is: ‘Do I need to rebuild my company’s systems on Blockchain?’ And the answer, every time, is ‘No, you’re asking the wrong question’.

Michelle O'Keeffe

CEO, Engaging.io

Customer value proposition: Getting the brand promise to your customers right

Throughout my career, I have witnessed a litany of brand names that profess to have a unique customer value proposition (CVP). In reality, however, they’ve had little more than a ‘value proposition’: A simple list of benefits applied to a general audience.

Ric Navarro

Global director of marketing and communications, Norman, Disney & Young

What is your opinion about chatbots serving your customers? My belief is bots are going to be the future of customer service and fulfilme...

Giridhar Prathap Reddy

NAB taps power of AI chatbots for business customer service

Read more

Thanks for writing about chatbots. Definitely bots have the exciting future when it comes to customer engagement, transactional and conve...

Giridhar Prathap Reddy

Deloitte TMT Predictions: AR and mobile crucial for marketing success in 2018

Read more

Hi there! Thanks for this interesting article! I love to read about new technology and software that makes our lives easier. I'm looking ...

Julia Summer

Wartsila overhauls Web platforms to create ‘seamless’ brand experience across all devices

Read more

RE: Sales and marketing SLAs, often the choke point isn't the teams but them getting the data into the tools they want to use with the da...

Ed Fry

Why sales and marketing alignment is more important than ever

Read more

Thank you for the good and very helpful information. It is very interesting. I love all the things you share and see your beautiful creat...

รัตนาวดี ภูมิวรรณ

Former eHarmony marketing chief joins telco startup

Read more

Latest Podcast

More podcasts

Sign in